July 11, 2009

Terminator Salvation

terminator-salvation-poster-1

The great thing about Japanese TV is that when a Hollywood sequel is released in theaters, every previous movie is shown on TV. In the last few weeks, we got to enjoy all three of the previous Terminator movies.

So by the time I got to watch Terminator Salvation, I was able to get a nice review of the entire series.

In previous incarnations, cybernetic assassins had come back to kill the mother of the future leader of the resistance, the leader himself, and then when those attempts failed, the officers of the resistance. In T-4, the conceit of robots being sent from the future is retired, and the future is finally the main backdrop for the movie.

Terminator-Salvation-Moto-Terminator

I’m a sucker for cool futuristic machines, and for post-apocalyptic narratives. Those things alone were able to erase many plot holes. I chose to ignore how people were able to survive nuclear blasts (two are in the movie). I also turned a blind eye to how easily humans were rescued from the epicenter of the robot civilization. It was conspicuously undefended.

I also chose not to be troubled by the fact that the “capital” of the machine world was San Francisco. It somewhat makes sense since Silicon Valley is nearby. But it seems like a sneaky subtext of portraying leftist SF as the ground zero of technological evil. It’s straight out of some right-wing paranoid fantasy.

Because the story is set in the future, many characters no longer make an appearance. Most conspicuously, Arnold Schwarzenegger is absent except through a computer rendered version. But I guess he figured he’s overseeing enough real life carnage and havoc in California’s economy. The psychiatrist who has appeared in every previous movie is gone. Sarah Connor only appears via voice recordings, consulted by her son as a kind of tabletop prophecy or oracle. The role of John Connor’s father is reprised, and it was cool to see an actor picked who looked like the original actor.

Even though John Connor, as the leader of the human resistance, should be the most important character of the story, he is presented as more of a McGuffin to the compelling Marcus Wright character, played by Sam Worthington. This would make it the second movie in a row that Christian Bale has been overshadowed by a supporting Australian actor (the first one being his Batman taking a back seat to Heath Ledger’s Joker).

When watching a movie like T-4, my only requirement is that I be entertained, that the flaws of the movie not be distracting. But this time, the slick designs of the imagined future distracted me from improbable plot points. And that’s good enough for me.

June 28, 2009

The Archetypal Friend: A Demographic Analysis of My Facebook Friends, Part 2

mass laughter

In this post, we find out who my most typical Facebook friend is, statistically speaking.

In Part 1, we saw how privileged and not representational my Facebook friends (and all Facebookians) are.  But surely for someone who has lived on 3 continents, involved with a broad international community, my Facebook friends represent a good cross-section of the world in other regards.  Let’s see.

Girl Power
In the global village of 100, men and women constitute 50 each.  In my village, 60.5% are women and 39.5% are men.  That’s quite a dramatic difference.  I think the main reason for this is because of my involvement in dance, a field overwhelmingly filled with women.  As far as I’m concerned, the more women in my life the better.

CIMG2190.JPG

Age Distribution
I couldn’t find a good source for global age distribution.  They lump people in three groups: under 15, 15 to 65, and over 65.  Not terribly useful I’m afraid, since every one of my Facebook friends are in that 15 to 65 range.

The vast majority, nearly 60% of my Facebook village is 30 to 39. This makes sense since I’m in my 30’s too.  To compare that with the US, people aged 20 to 44, a much broader range, make up only 37% of the population.

This is followed by nearly an equal number of people in their 20s (13.2%) and in their 40s (16.2%).  I was surprised by this.  I thought my village would be more evenly distributed among these three age groups.  I especially thought the 20’s would be much more represented since that’s the age that’s savviest with social networking sites.

Teens, another internet savvy group, make up only 4.8%.  They are mostly kids of my friends.  And there was a sprinkling of friends in their 50s (1.8%).  In the real world I have a lot more friends who are 50 and older, but most of them do not frequent Internetland.  And good for them.

Nationality
I’ve got friends who are citizens of 35 countries.  That’s a pretty good variety of nations.  But most of those countries are only represented by 1 friend, so it’s not as diverse as it sounds.

Here’s what the global village of 100 looks like:

  • 61 villagers are citizens of Asian countries (of that, 20 are Chinese and 17 are Indian).
  • 13 are African.
  • 12 are European.
  • 5 are South American.
  • 8 are North American (5 from the US).
  • 1 of the villagers is from Australia, New Zealand and Oceania.

How does my Facebook village compare?

buddha graveyard

My Facebook village is skewed towards North Americans (64.9%), Europeans (14.9%) and Asians (11.4%).  It makes sense since those are the continents that I’ve lived in.  The two most populous countries are barely represented in my village; I can count my Chinese and Indian friends on one hand.  It’s important to note that this doesn’t include ethnicity, only citizenship.  I’ll get to race and ethnicity in  Part 3.

Each of those continental figures are further skewed to single countries: the US (62.7%), Japan (8.8%) and the UK (6.6%).  The heavy US representation is because I’m American and have spent most of my life there.  I’m surprised the figures for Japan and the UK aren’t bigger.  The low figure for Japan can be explained because most of my Japanese friends use Mixi, the predominant social networking site in Japan.  And while I lived in the UK, my university community was very international.

Most surprisingly, even though I’m ethnically Korean and still have relatives in Korea, I have no Facebook friends who are citizens of Korea.  Do most Koreans use another social networking site?

Australians and New Zealanders in my village number more than 3 times the global average, at just over 3%.

South Americans are a mere 2.6%.  Africans are a paltry 2.2%.  I have quite a few more friends from these continents in real life, but they are not on Facebook.

A Side Story

Just to illustrate how difficult it is to get on Facebook (and on the internet), let me tell you a story.  One of my fellow graduate students in the UK was a soft-spoken Sudanese man.  Near the end of our program, a week before he returned to Sudan, I took a group shot of our class and he asked me for a copy of the picture.  I told him I’d email it to everyone as an attachment.

He explained that it was difficult to get on the internet and check his email in Sudan.  And even then, there would be no guarantee that the computer would be attached to a printer, much less a color printer that could print photos.  I couldn’t fathom this situation and since he told me this with his usual big smile I thought he was just teasing me.

A day before he left, he told me again his situation but with more of an air of desperation.  I took him more seriously this time and we went to a print shop and we got the photo developed then and there.

He was not some poor herdsman.  He was a graduate student studying in the UK, so he had some means.  Yet even he had difficulties getting online.

a buddha was here

All Around the Pacific Rim
Even though there are 8.8% citizens from Asian countries, 21.9% of my friends live in Asia.  Almost all of these are expats living in Tokyo, the city most called home among my friends.

An overwhelming number of my friends (54.8%) live in North America.  Still, compared to the 62.7% of people who are US citizens, this suggests that quite a few live outside the continent.  Within the US, my Facebook friends are clustered along the West Coast.  Almost 25% live in Oregon.  And at least another 10% are in California.

I don’t know where all of my friends live, so these figures are probably much higher.  If you add up all my friends who live in Seattle and Vancouver, I’d estimate that more than 45% of my Facebook village is on the West Coast of North America.  That means at least 65% live on the North Pacific Rim.

Sexual Orientation
In the global village of 100, 10 are gay, lesbian or bisexual.  In my Facebook village, they represent 8%.  But I don’t know the sexual orientation of all my friends.  So that means only 8% are out, that I know of.  I’m certain this number is much, much higher.  Come out, come out, wherever you are!

University of Facebook
I run with a highly educated crowd.  Almost 23% of my Facebook friends have MAs.  And 7% have, or are working on, their PhDs.  That’s remarkable.  That’s nearly a third with post-graduate degrees.  And that only includes the ones that I know of.  These numbers are high because most of them were my classmates in graduate school.

They outnumber all the people that I’d met from elementary school through college (17%).

Not to be outdone by the academics, people who I’ve met in the dance field make up 14% of my friends.  I didn’t add up all the musicians and visual artists, but I’m sure they make up significant groups too.

Names
The most common woman’s name is some variation of Anne.  The most common man’s name is, not surprisingly, some form of John, with David, Eric and James close behind.  There was no significantly common surname, but there were quite a few with variations of Wood.

There are many cool names. But the coolest has got to be Aejaz Zahid.  Aejaz is actually also a very cool person.

head on a stick

The Archetypal Friend
Now that we have a fairly complete picture of my Facebook community, we can identify my typical friend.  Let’s call her Wind’s Archetypal Friend.

She is an American woman in her 30s, named Anne Wood, living on the West Coast of the United States, probably Oregon.  She is highly educated and is involved in the arts, most likely dance.  She also has a tendency to befriend handsome intelligent talented men who reduce her down to a set of statistics.

And that’s probably more than you ever wanted to know about my Facebook village.  Next, in Part 3, I delve into the most controversial of all categories of identity, race.

June 26, 2009

The Gated Community: A Demographic Analysis of My Facebook Friends, Part 1

still life with mannequins

This is a 3 part essay on the demographic make-up of my Facebook friends. In this post, I explain my methods and show how disturbingly exclusive the Facebook village is.

A Facebook Census
When I befriended my 200th Facebook friend earlier this year, I decided to analyze the demographic patterns in my Facebook community. I did this because I’m a nerd and also because I like to deconstruct things in my spare time. Some men like to tinker with their cars. I like to tinker under the hood of society and culture.

So what I did was type in all the names of my Facebook friends into an Excel file and coded in data about them as if I were taking a census. I entered such things as gender, age range, citizenship, current country where they live, race, period of my life when I met them, and even sexual preferences. I wanted to see how representative they were of the rest of the world.  I’ll cover these in Part 2.

The data is hardly accurate since I had to guess some things like age or residence. Quite a few of my friends are dual citizens so I listed them under the country they actually grew up in or spent the most time in. And unlike most censuses, I avoided the topic of income, or socio-economic level, since they would have been wild guesses on my part. Similarly, I only have the vaguest inklings on what religion most of my friends practice. However, I did note educational levels.

Race was another tricky one, since a) race is constructed differently in each country, and b) so many of my friends are of mixed heritage. This deserves a post all its own, which will come in Part 3.

The project sounds tedious and time-consuming, but it must be noted that after years of being a researcher and collecting data, and being a fast typist, I was able to do this in under 2 hours. Analyzing and writing about the data is what takes longer.

The Gated Community
Before sharing my findings, I thought it might be interesting to tell you what the world would look like if it were a village of 100 people (from the Miniature Earth).

I was able to see how dramatically privileged my community is compared to the rest of the world. In the village of 100,

  • 80 live in substandard housing.
  • 67 are unable to read.
  • 50 are malnourished and 1 is dying of starvation.
  • 18 live on less than US$1 per day. 53 live on less than US$2 per day.
  • 33 don’t have access to a safe water supply.
  • 24 do not have any electricity.

I may not know what the income is for any of my friends, but I’m fairly confident in asserting that all 228 of my Facebook friends live in a decent place, have enough food, live on more than $2 a day, have clean plentiful water, and are literate.

If you have a bank account, you’d be among the richest 8. And I’m pretty sure all my friends have bank accounts.

Of the village of 100, 12 have a computer and 3 have access to the Internet. To even be in my Facebook village, you need a computer and access to the Internet. So all 228 of my friends represent only 3% of the world population. If you’re reading this blog, you’re in that 3% too. That’s a very exclusive gated community. It’s startling and humbling.

In Part 2, I’ll look at gender, national identity, and other categories of identity.

June 22, 2009

15 (+1) Great Books

wizard77.JPG

I did this viral exercise from Facebook:

Name 15 books that have made a strong impression on you. List them in 15 minutes. It doesn’t have to be books you love, just ones that you can’t shake.

I enjoyed doing this but as usual I couldn’t follow the instructions and instead listed 16. 15 is arbitrary. As far as a “good” number goes, I think 12 would have been a solid archetypal figure to pick. But I wouldn’t know how, after listing 16, to whittle it down to 12, much less back to 15.

I wonder if it’s significant the order in which the books popped into my mind. One book reminded me of another, and so it went. Whatever the significance, I’ve reordered them here into groups and annotated them.

gladwell

Patterns. Three books of non-fiction found themselves on the list. All three attempt to answer the big questions by understanding underlying patterns.

Guns, Germs and Steel. Jared Diamond. This book was Number One on the list. Diamond asks the question, why did the Spanish conquer the Incans and not the other way around? And by answering, he traces the history of human civilization and finds some surprising patterns. Every now and then I re-read a random chapter and get something new out of it.

The Tipping Point. Malcolm Gladwell (pictured above). I’m reading Gladwell’s latest book, Outliers, and love it. Like Diamond, he’s a master generalist, collecting eclectic research and presenting it in deliciously digestible form. In The Tipping Point, he explores how and why social trends start, looking at the factors that push a movement.

A Pattern Language. Christopher Alexander, et al. This architectural bible is about a million pages long and will cost you $60. Each page explains a building or planning archetype that has been repeated across cultures and eras. It’s both simple and deep.

leguin350

Fantasy. It’s strange only one fantasy book made it onto the list because I’d read so many in my teens. But fantasy books tend to blend into each other and so there aren’t that many that I couldn’t “shake.”

A Wizard of Earthsea. Ursula K LeGuin (shown right). This slim novel is the complete opposite of most fantasy books. It’s spare in its descriptions and the hero is often not heroic. It’s a tale of the hero’s journey, with big themes. At the same time, all the magic, dragons, and wizards are mere facts in this world, ordinary nuisances to be stepped over.

512

Magical realism. Two of my favorite authors. I enjoy their earlier works more than their recent creations. Sometimes I feel they’ve evolved beyond my level of comprehension, but I certainly love reading everything they throw out.

The Temple of My Familiar. Alice Walker (shown left). A soulful exploration of relationships, between men and women, animals and people, narrator and characters, writer and reader. All in that easy-going, mellifluous, but unshakeable voice of Walker. The story is fun too.

Sexing the Cherry. Jeannette Winterson. I sometimes get lost in Winterson’s experimental narratives. I couldn’t finish two of her novels. It’s a fine line. This book is just experimental enough to blow your mind, but not too much that you want to shoot yourself. I can’t even begin describing what this novel’s plot is. There’s a 17th Century explorer and his enormous dog-breeding mother. They sail around the world, time travel, and move through dimensions, in search of exotic fruit, and the 12 dancing princesses.

SalingerTime.JPG

Short stories. These are droll, understated, tragicomic tales, written by enigmatic and eccentric writers.

Nine Stories. JD Salinger (at right). I once read a critical review of this book that said that each story represented a Buddhist path. So I reread the book looking for signs of enlightenment. I guess a case can be made for some kind of religious meta-narrative. But I still returned to the haunting themes of post-World War II nihilism.

Pangs of Love. David Wong Louie. I don’t think Louie has written a book since. Too bad, because these stories have the same haunting but detached atmosphere of Salinger.

Octavia-Butler-799659

Post-apocalyptic feminist science fiction. It’s easy to call a work of fiction feminist just because the writer is a woman and the main character is a woman. But these four novels actually imagine post-patriarchal societies. And it’s lazy to call a story science fiction just because it’s set in the future. But as LeGuin points out, science also includes the social sciences. And these novels re-imagine social systems.

Also noteworthy is that 3 of the 4 are set in California. I think I need to write a blog post all its own about that.

He, She and It. Marge Piercy. In this future, corporations rule city-states. The protagonist however lives in one of the few non-corporate enclaves in a community of robot makers. The story is brilliantly interwoven with a story about a Jewish Polish community under Nazi rule.

Parable of the Sower. Octavia Butler (pictured above). A highly addictive drug that makes people into violent pyromaniacs has created chaos. A young woman makes her way up to Oregon along Highway 5, and develops a new religion.

Always Coming Home. Ursula K LeGuin. Another LeGuin book on the list. Self-described as “an archaeology of the future”, it envisions a post-industrial utopia in Northern California. There’s a main story, but the book is constructed as an anthology of articles about the Kesh culture. My copy even included a cassette of songs sung by the tribe’s members in their language.

The Fifth Sacred Thing. Starhawk. Another matriarchal utopia based in Northern California, under attack by a violent and autocratic Southern California society. It sounds like it could be a moralistic tale of contrived stereotypes and I avoided it for many years for that reason. But the world is vividly fleshed out and the intercultural dilemmas are played out in compelling philosophical dramas.

A Play.
Heartbreak House. George Bernard Shaw. This isn’t necessarily my favorite GB Shaw play. But it was the first one I watched (on PBS) and it made such an impression on me that I began reading all his plays and fell in love with his acid wit.

carl_sandburggibran010

Poetry. Only Sandburg’s book can properly be called a book of poetry. But the other two, while invariably in the philosophy sections of bookstores, read like poems.

Honey and Salt. Carl Sandburg (above left). So earthy, so spiritual. I love Carl Sandburg. His words are like a brisk desert wind.

The Prophet. Kahlil Gibran (above right). Before a wise person sails away, the people ask him to talk about various subjects like love, money, children. I consult this book as an oracle. If there’s a subject I need clarity on this is where i go.

Tao Te Ching. Lao Tzu. So few words. Truth condensed down to its essentials.

There are so many great books that I haven’t been able to shake.  I was going to write a list of honorable mentions, but perhaps I’ll save that for another post.  What’s on your list?

June 16, 2009

Lakers Get 15th!

57690340

The Los Angeles Lakers won their 15th NBA championship yesterday. Only the hated Boston Celtics have more, by a pair. But no other team has reached the finals as much as the Lakers, 30 times out of the 62 years of NBA history. Has any other team dominated their sport like the Lakers?

Last year, the Lakers lost ignominiously to the Celtics. And immediately afterward, the world went into a massive recession of unprecedented proportions. The world’s largest home loan lender went out of business. So did the world’s largest insurance conglomerate, major investment banks, and a couple automakers as well. I also began experiencing excruciating back problems.

No good can come from the Celtics winning the championship.

When the Lakers win, the world becomes a better place. Except for 2001. And I guess the IT crash of 2002 wasn’t so great either. But in all the other years, good things happened. I think.

Oh who cares. Lakers baby!

box